i just thought about how since young the sentiment to take all knowledge to be my province, and even thought i've partied and had that industrial accident, i'm in my sixties and there isn't anything as subject of conversation i can't expound on and it's relevance to today, and if not i'd ask the questions to steer towards its relevance; hope this writ proceeding goes, it really is a huge public interest
Friday, May 8, 2026
Thursday, May 7, 2026
dear diary
i guess things are getting desperate, i'm now looking up things for significance, anything to inspire in a world going dark
a duck
went to
old poem
Ocean Of Stars
The view above on this clear night,
away from city light,
reveals the colossal affair:
that which our psyche receives
and streams through our being—
where when a lover holds a lover,
they hold in their arms
an ocean of stars
with a beating heart.
neat guidebook
Wednesday, May 6, 2026
poem
(untitled)
For so many years
she's been everything—
muse; a great artist
watched from the back row.
If something so beautiful exists,
the basis of the universe must be love.
Tuesday, May 5, 2026
dear diary
On train to downtown to file papers and print up Request for Judicial Notice and Proposed Order granting it.....
I seem to be going through a most interesting understanding of my fellow humans in that I've always believed I could bring someone round to understanding, with reason and logic, though these days my default position seems to be becoming that, because most are sleepwalking, they are tantamount to a wild animal that cannot and does not want to understand anything I have to say. How strange a position--not alienated--just cognizant they
Friday, May 1, 2026
inter-library loan
Thursday, April 30, 2026
book find
dear diary
On way to LA Law Library to print up the Second Notice to Prepare/Transmit the four calls with Respondent, and Request for Judicial Notice of the California Department of Insurance letter stating they can't do anything and the court is the only remedy. My prob is there are pros and cons to filing it early, before I file the Opposition to the Demurrer, or to save it and file with the Opposition. Hm, got until tomorrow to figure it out. In other news it looks like the Malibu Art Association may finally agree to have a Zoom, bring the by-laws, and see where we're at and if we want to set up the association to become solid. Have made a couple good sales lately which have been miraculous, with so much uncertainty, and the advent of the Iran conflict, impulse sales at Farmer's Markets have evaporated considerably.
Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Monday, April 27, 2026
good song to create art
https://music.apple.com/us/album/my-heart-beats-like-a-drum-dam-dam-dam-radio-edit/1308905266?i=1308905284 Sent from my iPhone
Sunday, April 26, 2026
how many works to this one; lots
https://music.apple.com/us/album/why-oh-why/1308905266?i=1308905951 Sent from my iPhone
Saturday, April 25, 2026
dear diary
jusr realized i used the word "indexes" in last update, and thought crossed my mind of the incorrectness--indices
Friday, April 24, 2026
Thursday, April 23, 2026
Opening to Opposition to Demurrer
I. INTRODUCTION
As an arts educator, the first day of class Petitioner uses a metaphor to help bring focus and clarity to students who are set to engage in the act of creating art—a framing hammer: while it can be used as a doorstop or paperweight for plans on a windy job-site, its ultimate use is to drive nails into lumber to create shelter—art can be used to decorate and entertain, but its ultimate use is to elevate perception and create meaning in the world we all inhabit. Similarly, while a Writ proceeding can command a simple ministerial duty between private parties, its ultimate use as established in Neto v. Brazil is to exact substantial justice where substantial harm is present and ongoing, and further, as established in Betty v. Superior Court—to promote justice—to vitalize and strengthen justice. This Writ Petition is not mere private dispute, but a matter of profound public interest. When one of California’s largest auto insurers, representing nearly 7% of this State’s motorists, is permitted to use the word “discretion” to defray investigation costs and/or justify an arbitrary premium hike while simultaneously placing a sword of imminent harm over an insured’s head in the form of DMV points, the California Code of Regulations is rendered a nullity and public records become a repository of taint. This proceeding in part aims to protect 1.4 million policyholders from a parasitic loop which prioritizes profit over mandatory duties of this State’s laws.
Petitioner here reminds Respondent that what has been set forth in the Petition are not allegations, but Verified Facts stated under penalty of perjury. For the purposes of this Demurrer, these facts must be accepted as true. (See Thomas v. Regents, supra). While Respondent repeatedly uses the term ‘allege’ to characterize elements of the Petition, they are sworn testimony of a direct witness. Unless and until Respondent provides evidence to the contrary, Petitioner’s sworn record is the factual reality of this case.
Petitioner has often subbed for high school classes where government and civics are discussed and Petitioner informs students that all law is composed of two things—letter and spirit: what does the law say and why does it say what it does? CCP 1085 states a writ may be granted without notice—express in its implication of the broad discretion the Superior Court of this State has in this proceeding.
The Petition was filed March 10 of this year, and on that date Petitioner was thoroughly exhausted mentally and emotionally, as if suddenly trapped in a dark wood without vision or direction as to what might happen from that date. In the weeks since, sunlight has dawned, risen overhead, and as Petitioner will show unto the Court below, the scope of this dispute has evolved from a private disagreement into a clear matter of public interest regarding the integrity of public records. Through diligent review of administrative records and notable silences discovered therein, Petitioner brings this Opposition not only to contest a procedural motion, but to defend the structural integrity of public records.
As a dynamic instrument of equity the writ proceeding exists precisely for this moment—where with time and diligence the truth has exposed a parasitic practice previously hidden. Petitioner does not merely seek damages; Petitioner seeks enforcement of State regulations which are prerequisite to the constitutional right of due process under the Vehicle Code.
Finally, Respondent’s Demurrer, based on foundational misapprehension and mischaracterizations of law and facts, argues a Writ here is improper because Petitioner has an adequate remedy at law (a civil suit) and that no ministerial duty was breached, thus Respondent’s Demurrer’s premise of “absolute discretion” effectively argues for a license to ignore objective physical evidence and sworn witness testimony, a position that would render 10 CCR § 2695.7(d)—which mandates a reasonable investigation—meaningless. A civil suit for damages cannot purify a tainted public record—damages are compensatory, a writ is rectifying.
II. THE APPLICABLE STANDARD
The standard for evaluating a Demurrer is well-settled: a demurrer tests only the legal sufficiency of the pleading, not the truth of its verified subject matter, and a Court “must treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded.” (Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966). Because this Petition is Verified, a court must treat its record as factual, admitted, and draw every reasonable inference in Petitioner’s favor. (Perez v. Golden Empire Transit Dist. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 1228, 1238). At this stage the inquiry is simple: if the facts are true—which law states they are—does the Petition warrant a remedy? Respondent’s Demurrer rests on the flawed premise that Petitioner has failed to state a cause of action. However, a Demurrer cannot be sustained if the facts—viewed through the lens of liberal construction—show the Petitioner is entitled to forms of relief. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318). In a Code of Civil Procedure § 1085 proceeding, the Court’s inquiry is whether the Respondent has failed to perform an act which the law “specially enjoins.” While Respondent argues for “absolute discretion,” the Standard of Review dictates that if Petitioner has pleaded facts showing an abuse of discretion or a failure to comply with mandatory regulations (such as 10 CCR § 2695.7), the Demurrer must be overruled. The Court is not here to weigh evidence today; it is here to determine if the facts, if proven, warrant a remedy. A demurrer tests only the legal sufficiency of the pleading, leaving the truth of the underlying facts for a later determination on the merits.
