dear diary

been grilling AI about next moves/various anticipated tactics by respondent in writ proceeding; from here unfolds quickly, like dropping in behind peak, and tubed, seeing legal line to get spit out onto shoulder--the bodily injury point vacated from dmv record and substantial damages awarded; as its dawned on me, it's a public interest issue affecting a broad class of citizens (whoever has auto insurance); the two main issues i've brought before the court: 1) if fire insurance contains a ministerial duty to produce a complete claim file--why not auto too? 2) and if auto insurer notifies insured of third party claim insured declares fraudulent, and the insurer cannot put duty to investigate on insured, should it be statutory law in such an instance that insurer immediately identify security camera content to exonerate insured?