While application/petition have various legal meanings, we're discussing them in regards to Article V, where they take on specific meaning. Of course there are the same doubts and same arguments since 1787, you seem to be saying that because (some) people got it wrong 200+ years ago (and for the same reasons as today), you have an excuse.
Article V was specifically/calculatedly written to preclude control by the national government and/or state governments. To misinterpret that in order to address bogus fears regarding free discussion at a non-binding deliberative assembly is either intellectual dishonesty or cognitive dissonance--either way it’s an obstruction of justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment